Earlier today , the Department of Justice filed the latest in a long series of paperwork , this time telling Apple to stop being a child and unlock the blamed phone . Apple ’s general counselling just respond , and he ’s pissed .
On a conference call to talk over the DoJ ’s filing — itself a response to Apple ’s answer — Apple ’s Bruce Sewell ratcheted up the rhetoric . Up to this point , both sides have courteously disagreed with each other , but the civility seems to be ending :
For the first time ever , we see an allegation that Apple has deliberately made changes to block jurisprudence enforcement requests for access . This should be profoundly offensive to everyone that read it . An unsupported , unsubstantiated effort to vilify Apple rather than confront the military issue in the casing .
Emphasis added
It ’s a no - hold - barred attack on the DOJ ’s position , alledging for the first time that the DOJ is being mailicious about the integral affair , rather than just overly demanding . Sewell continue on in the same fashion for three wonderfully angry paragraph . Grab some popcorn , because this ai n’t ending any meter soon .
The tone of the brief register like an bill of indictment . We ’ve all take heed theatre director Comey and Attorney General Lynch thank Apple for its consistent help in influence with police enforcement . Director Comey ’s own statement … that there are no demons here ? We sure as shooting would n’t conclude it from this legal brief . In 30 years of recitation , I do n’t think I ’ve ever check a legal brief that was more intended to smear the other side with false accusations and insinuation , and less intended to focalise on the substantial merits of the case . For the first time ever , we see an allegation that Apple has deliberately made changes to block practice of law enforcement petition for access . This should be deeply nauseous to everyone that reads it . An unsupported , unsubstantiated effort to vilify Apple rather than confront the issues in the case .
To do this in a brief before a magistrate judge just shows the despair that the Department of Justice now feels . We would never reply in sort . But suppose Apple ask a tribunal whether the FBI could be trust because , there is this real question about whether J. Edgar Hoover order the assassination of Kennedy . See ConspiracyTheory.com as our supporting grounds . We add security feature to protect our client from hackers and criminals . And the FBI should be helping to support us in this because it keep everyone safe . To advise otherwise is demeaning . It cheapens the debate and it tries the mask the existent and serious issue . I can only conclude that the Justice Department is so desperate at this item that it has discombobulate all decorum to the winds .
Look , we acknowledge there are great hoi polloi in the DoJ and the FBI . We work shoulder to shoulder with them all the time . That ’s why this cheap scene legal brief surprises us so much . We facilitate when we ’re call for to . We ’re honest about what we can and ca n’t do . Let ’s at least process one another with respect and get this typesetter’s case before the American people in a creditworthy elbow room . We are going to court to practice our legal rights . Everyone should beware , because it seems like take issue with the Department of Justice have in mind you must be malign and anti - American . Nothing could be further from the truth .
[ 9to5Mac ]
Apple
Daily Newsletter
Get the best technical school , skill , and culture newsworthiness in your inbox day by day .
News from the future , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like
